I have to admit, I get a large amount of pleasure getting paid a dividend or distribution for owning an investment. While I don’t think it’s necessary to get paid to wait, I do admit feeling a certain fondness for income. Maybe I’m getting risk adverse in my old age, or maybe I’m just realizing my fixed income portfolio is sorely lacking. Whatever the reason, I’m hungry for yield lately.

Or maybe it’s french fries I’m hungry for. I’m not too sure, but a plate of fries sounds pretty delicious right now.

Anyway, I happened to stumble upon a BMO ETF that has an interesting strategy. The ETF holds mostly shares in the Canadian banks, while writing long term calls on the shares it already owns (which is called writing a covered call). Since the fund yields close to 10%, I have to check this bad boy out.

All info comes direct from BMO’s website.

The Basics

Ticker Symbol: ZWB

Price (Closing price on March 30): $16.31

Net Asset Value (March 30) $16.29

Portfolio Yield: 9.56%

Annual Management Fee: 0.65%

RRSP/TFSA Eligible: Yes

Units Issued: 4,800,000

Date Started: Jan 28, 2011

As you can see, the fund is brand new, only being traded for 2 months. This fund holds approximately 50% of its assets in BMO’s equal weight banks ETF, with the rest being spread out over the 6 main Canadian banks. Then, a very small percentage of the portfolio is used to buy the call options on certain banks.

The annual management fee is a little high at 0.65%. There is a degree of active management in this fund with the call writing, so that could be good or bad, depending on your perspective.

The Fund’s Strategy

How does the fund have such a high yield? And how does it make money writing these calls? First of all, a primer on covered calls.

If an investor already owns a stock, then selling a covered call is a way to get income from that position, providing the stock price remains fairly steady or goes up over time. I’m going to let BMO explain this one, take it away guys.

The covered call option strategy allows the portfolio to generate income from the written call option premiums in addition to the dividend income from the underlying stocks.

As an example, consider a portfolio that consists of 100 shares of Bank of Montreal (BMO) at a current price of $60, for a total value of $6,000. At the money (ATM) call options (exercise at $60) that expire in one month are valued at a premium of $1.50 per contract. To implement a covered call strategy, the portfolio writes call options on 100 BMO shares and receives $150 in premium. If the stock price remains at $60, the calls are not exercised, and the portfolio benefits from the premium received. The new portfolio value is $6,150.

Still with me? Good. Now what happens if the price of the underlying stock goes down?

If the stock price drops to $58.50, the calls are not exercised, but the portfolio value drops. The new portfolio value is $6,000 ($5,850 + $150) which is the break even point. The portfolio will devalue at any price below $58.50.

If the share price goes up beyond $61.50, the portfolio will miss out on some potential returns, since the gains from the call option are limited to $1.50.

Distribution Risks

The whole point of the strategy is to exchange current income for upside potential. During periods where bank stocks do well, this strategy will under perform the index. An investor looking for income will make that trade off, assuming the income stays consistent.

I’m not an expert on options by any means, but I’m assuming the income from this fund is dependent on the management writing effective calls. I presume these calls are short term in nature, meaning the premiums from them aren’t very much, but are relatively safe due to the short time period. Looking at the fund’s current holdings, we see call options expiring on the 16th of April. I assume the fund managers are writing calls each quarter.

From what I can see, the only major risks for distributions are management completely dropping the ball on the covered calls, liquidity in the options market drying up, or a cut in the dividend for one of the underlying banks. While these risks should be kept in mind, I don’t see any being a very realistic scenario.

Another concern is the lack of track record for the portfolio. Investors have used covered calls in just this manner for a long time. The strategy has a long track record. But sometimes, stuff will happen that even astute investors won’t have seen coming. That’s always a risk when investing in an actively managed fund, a risk that becomes a little more dangerous in a new fund.

Will I Buy It?

I’m thinking about buying this one for my non-registered portfolio. Since any returns will be in the form of dividends or capital gains, this is a good way to get income that will be taxed favorably.

I’d recommend only making this ETF a small percentage of your fixed income holdings. The yield is telling an investor that this strategy isn’t risk free. I think over time it will work out okay. This strategy is a little more risky than government bonds, that’s for sure.

The fund pays distributions monthly, with the next ex-dividend date not until April 26th. There’s no need to rush into this one right away. If the bank stocks decline before the end of April, there might be an opportunity to buy this fund with a yield over 10%.

I do not own shares in the BMO Covered Call Canadian Bank ETF. If I do buy some, I’ll definitely let you guys know.

 

 

 

Here’s part 10 of my 10 step series on mortgages here at Financial Uproar every Wednesday.  Every step of the process will be covered from the application to qualifying to tips and tricks to save money on your mortgage and everything in between. To read all of these just click on the category Mortgage Basics.

Finally, the sweet, sweet end to this train wreck of a series. Are you sick of mortgages yet? Oh you aren’t? Good.

This post will be the combination of all the others, the massive how to guide for Canadian mortgages. It’s your one stop shop about everything a borrower needs to know before signing their name on the bottom line of a mortgage contract. This guide is so awesome and huge that it actually has its own gravitational pull. It’s going to be legen -wait for it- dary!

How I Met Your Mother is the best.

Anyway, every step from the application process to money saving tips will be shared in this post. Be sure to bookmark it, since I’m sure you’ll be referring to it on an hourly basis for the rest of your life.

The Application Process

Chances are you’ll spend that initial meeting nervously waiting for the lender to approve you. You give the lender all of your information and they spend some time inputting that into a computer. Then you give them the information on the house you’re buying. At some point the lender pulls your credit report as well. If the lender likes the information, the borrower is approved. If not, borrowers are rejected and they probably cry. At least, that’s what I would do.

After that initial approval, a borrower must then prove to the mortgage lender that the information contained in the application is factual. If you’re dealing with your bank some of this verification comes easy; after all, they can just check your account to see whether you have as much money as you say. Other verifications are a little harder and might require some hustling on your part to get these things done.

A borrower will need several kinds of statements to prove their income, the source of their down payment and other paperwork such as information on the house being purchased, any child support or alimony payments (either paid out or received) and a copy of the purchase contract. Income is proven by paystubs and a letter from the employer for salaried borrowers, and by 2 years of  Notice of Assesssments for self employed borrowers.

With all the mortgage fraud that exists in the market, lenders remain extra cautious when it comes to confirming a borrower’s information. By the end of the process, most borrowers will be frustrated by the mountains of paperwork.

The Down Payment

To get a mortgage in Canada, a borrower has to have at least 5% of the property’s value for a down payment. The lender supplies the rest of the money to pay for the house and the borrower slowly pays back the lender. To avoid CMHC insurance premiums, a borrower must put 20% of the house’s value up as a down payment.

For the most part, any money you have sitting in any account can be used as a down payment. Money in a chequing or savings account obviously can. It’s the same thing with money or even securities sitting in a brokerage account, except the securities will have to be sold. Even a borrower’s RRSP can be used, providing the borrower pays that money back in 15 years. If the borrower doesn’t, that money will be taxed. You can even use your TFSA or equity in an existing property as a down payment.

The borrower has two options if they don’t have the cash available to cover the down payment. They can either borrow the money or get the money as a gift from a relative. A borrower can either borrower the money in the form of a unsecured line of credit, or use a cash back mortgage to repay a down payment loan. A cash back mortgage can’t be used directly for the down payment. Or, if a borrower has a relative that is willing to help them, they can get a gift from that relative, providing both parties sign a simple agreement that there is no expectation of repayment.

Canadian lenders are extremely flexible when it comes to down payments. If you can’t come up with the required down payment, then maybe homeownership should be rethought.

Income Qualifying

The two ratios that determine your maximum mortgage are gross debt service ratio (GDS) and total debt service ratio (TDS). The formulas are as follows:

GDS: Payment + Property Tax + Heat + ½ Condo Fees = less than 32% of gross income

TDS: Payment + Property Tax + Heat + ½ Condo Fees + All Other Debts = less than 40% of gross income

The formulas are much less complicated than they appear to be. If you made $72,000 per year (that’s $6,000) per month then all you’d need to do is multiply 6000 by .32 and .40 to get the maximums, in this case being $1920 and $2400.

What that means is $1920 per month maximum can go toward the mortgage payment, property tax, gas bills and half the condo fees (if applicable). This also gives the borrower a maximum of $480 per month of debt payments the lender will tolerate.

Depending on how high a borrower’s credit score is, GDS and TDS ratios can go higher. Any borrower with a credit score above 680 can have a GDS or TDS up to 44% of their gross income.

Let’s look at a real world example.

Couple A makes a combined $80,000 per year. What’s the maximum mortgage they’d qualify for? They have excellent credit (both above 700) and have a car payment of $400 per month. They’re looking for a 5 year fixed rate of 4.5%.

Income: $6666 per month

Debt: $400

Property Taxes (estimate) $400

Heat: $85

Condo Fees: N/A

So we multiply $6666 by .44 to get $2933.33. This is the maximum the couple can pay for their commitments.

$2933.33-$400-$400-$85 = $2048.33

$2048.33 is the maximum mortgage payment this couple can have. Plugging that back into a mortgage calculator, it means the couple can max themselves out at $370.087, assuming they take out a 25 year amortization. This couple could qualify for more if they extended their amortization to 30 years.

Of course, just because a borrower can qualify for a specific number, doesn’t mean they should max themselves out. I would recommend to everyone not surpassing the 32%/40% ratios, no matter what their credit score is. Ideally, I’d want a borrower to not spend 32% of their income on housing plus debt. However, I realize in many Canadian cities this isn’t very realistic.

CMHC Default Insurance

CMHC has all sorts of different homeowner products (more info on them can be found at CMHC’s website) that have different insurance policies depending on the size of the down payment and the length of the amortization. If you have a bigger down payment then the premium amount goes down. If you amortize the mortgage longer than 25 years then the insurance premium goes up. Basically anything a borrower does to make the loan more risky increases the premium amount.

CMHC insurance is mandatory for any mortgage with less than 20% down. Sometimes it required by the lender on properties with more than 20% down, especially rental properties. Once a borrower applies for a mortgage and the lender approves it, the lender then sends that mortgage into CMHC for their approval. CMHC receives the electronic submission and looks at two things- the borrower and the property.

Since so many homes have CMHC insurance, the system has a large database of similar homes in the very same neighborhood that it can use as comparables. Using the database, the system comes up with a value for the home, a number they will insure up to. Once the borrower’s credit is also verified CMHC will approve the property.

The premium is added to the principle owing the borrower doesn’t have to come up with the case for an insurance policy totalling thousands of dollars. Don’t confuse mortgage default insurance with mortgage life insurance. The only person mortgage default insurance protects is the lender. The borrower won’t see two dimes if the bank is forced to take back the house.

Fixed Or Variable Rate

Typically a borrower will save money if they go with a variable rate. According to mortgage guru Moshe Milevsky in a study published in 2001, variable rate mortgages came out ahead of their fixed rate counterparts 88% of the time since 1950. Those savings can really add up on a mortgage in the hundreds of thousands and over 25 years.

Advocates of fixed rate mortgages often cite the stability of the payment as the biggest advantage of having a fixed rate and they are absolutely correct. The borrowers who take on the standard 5 year fixed loan take comfort that their payment will be the same every month, no matter what interest rates do. For them, taking out the fixed rate hedges their interest rate risk.

Ultimately, a borrower needs to decide how much this payment certainty is worth to them before deciding on a fixed or variable rate mortgage.

There are other options for borrowers who can’t decide between a fixed or variable mortgage. They could take a short term fixed term (say 1 or 2 years) which will have an interest rate lower than a 5 year fixed. Lenders are also starting to offer hybrid products that combine a fixed and variable mortgage, giving borrowers a lower interest rate and increased rate protection if interest rates go up.

Which Should You Use? Broker or Banker?

The first advantage to using a bank employee is the lack of paperwork required. Of course, this advantage only applies if you use your own banker, and not one from a competing brand. Since the bank already knows a bunch of the borrower’s info, there’s no need to reprove that. When the borrower uses a mortgage broker, they have to prove everything they’ve stated in their application. The new lender asks for copies of bank statements, pay stubs, and the like, to prove the borrower has the required down payment, they make as much as they said, etc. For most people, the excess paperwork is annoying.

Other borrowers will value the relationship they have with their banker. They have fond feelings for their loans officer because they’ve borrowed from the bank before, or perhaps they just think she fills out her sweater nicely. Confidentiality plays an issue with this point as well. Most people don’t want all sorts of people knowing their financial information. They reason that their bank already knows all this stuff, so they aren’t giving that information to anyone else. This is one of the reasons mortgage brokers do better in large cities than in small towns.

Many mortgage brokers will tout the large number of lenders they have access to as a reason for using a broker over a banker. The reality is if the borrower fits into the standard mold, most brokers have two or three lenders they split the majority of their business with.

While the banks have gotten better in their rate transparency, the borrower still often won’t know if the rate being offered by the bank is the bank’s best rate or not. Banks still enjoy playing the posted rate game, offering naive borrowers a crappier rate, in an effort to make the bank more money. Brokers don’t play this game since they thrive on offering lower rates.

Mortgage brokers are generally more flexible than traditional bank employees. Brokers are usually willing to come over to a borrower’s house to do the application, pick up documents, etc. Banks have responded to this flexibility by introducing mobile mortgage specialists, who work out of their homes and will go visit borrowers when it’s convenient, not just during business hours.

Brokers are paid on completed deals only. Therefore, a broker is likely to try harder to get a deal done than a bank employee who is paid salary. If a borrower has a tough deal to fund, the tenacity of a broker is definitely an advantage.

Payout Penalties

A payout penalty is a fee the lending institution charges a borrower for breaking the mortgage early, typically because the borrower has sold their house. When a borrower repays their mortgage early, the lender gets this lump sum they have to lend out again, this time at a shorter term. Lenders build in a payout penalty in the mortgage to compensate them for such an event.

There are two types of payout penalties a borrower will get charged. The lender will charge whichever one gives them the most money. Isn’t capitalism great? Most mortgages give the borrower the right to prepay 20% of the total principle a year or increase their payment by 20% without a penalty.

The first penalty is three months interest. This one is pretty simple, the lender just charges the borrower 3 months worth of interest.

The interest rate differential (IRD) is somewhat complex to figure out, so let’s crack out our math. It’s essentially the amount owing, multiplied by the interest rate difference between the current rate and the rate on the mortgage for the amount of time left, multiplied by the amount of time remaining. The IRD is only charged when rates have come down, because the lender wants a borrower to remain locked in at a higher rate.

Let’s look at an example. A borrower owes $300,000, 2 years in on a 5 year fixed mortgage at 5.89%. 3 year rates are now 3.89%. How much would the payout penalty be?

$300,000 x 2% x 3 years = 6% of the mortgage balance = $18,000.

By the time somebody pays their real estate agent, that penalty can easily represent the entire profit from the sale of a house. Meanwhile, a borrower who is paying down their mortgage aggressively, will want to limit their yearly repayment at 19.9%.

Borrowers can minimize these fees by being smart. If they know they’re planning on selling soon, then they’ll want to take out an open mortgage, which allows any prepayment without a penalty.

Credit Scores

If a borrower has a credit score above 680, they’ll qualify for any mortgage product CMHC offers. Any credit score above 680 is considered an excellent score, at least according to CMHC. If a borrower has a credit score above 680, CMHC allows the borrower to spend up to 44% of their income on the mortgage, heat, taxes and any other debts. If the borrower’s credit score is below 680, the borrower can only go up to 42% of their income. Any credit score below 610 and a borrower is pretty much out of luck without a co-signer.

Lenders are also looking for at least 2 years of history on a borrower’s credit report, usually from a car loan or credit card. Someone can have a great 1 year old credit report, but still be declined for a mortgage. Alternate sources of credit will be considered for the CMHC New To Canada Program, since the borrower doesn’t have enough time to gain the credit history needed. Possible examples of this can include rent payments or any utility payment. A year of history is needed, with only one late payment accepted. This program applies to recent immigrants or Canadians with a short credit history.

Money Saving Tips

What a borrower needs to do is ask their lender for a bi-weekly accelerated payment. The bi-weekly accelerated payment would be exactly half of the monthly payment, except made every 14 days instead of 15 or 16. That one simple step can cut a mortgage from 25 to 21.9 years just by paying the semi-monthly payment every two weeks.

Remember, the borrower has to ask the lender for bi-weekly accelerated payments, not just bi-weekly.

Typically variable rate mortgages can be had at a 1.5% discount to the comparable fixed rate product. If a borrower knows they’ll stay in the same home for the next 5 years, a 5 year variable mortgage is a solid choice.

Alternatively, a borrower can take a shorter term fixed mortgage, from 1 to 3 years. If a borrower knows there’s a chance they’ll be selling the house in the next couple of years, a shorter term can save thousands in a mortgage payout penalty. The short term fixed products won’t have the same discount as the variable products, but they’ll still be cheaper than a 5 year or longer fixed mortgage.

Putting down 20% (to avoid CMHC fees) and aggressively paying down the mortgage are other easy ways to save thousands over the course of a mortgage. You can thank me by giving some of that money to me.

Shopping around at renewal time will usually get the borrower a better deal, since many lenders won’t offer their best rates in the renewal letter. Spending less on a house will also save the borrower money in interest over the long term.

Conclusion

Getting a mortgage in Canada isn’t an easy process, especially for a naive borrower who has no idea about the process. Hopefully this guide can serve to save borrowers some money and to make the whole process easier and lead to making this stressful experience a little easier.

As always, feel free to ask any questions in the comments.

 

(By stones, I really mean balls)

For those of you not as far along in the investing terminology, shorting a stock is betting that the stock will go down in price. An investor borrowers the shares from their broker, and the shares are sold. Once the price of the shares goes down, the investor decides to cover their short, meaning they go back to the market and re-buy the shares they sold earlier. The spread between the sell price and the buy price is the profit.

There are risks involved in shorting a stock. If the share price goes up, an investor will lose money shorting. Since a stock can go up indefinitely, the theoretical loss potential from shorting can be much more than 100% of the initial investment. If the stock being shorted pays a dividend, the investor shorting the stock is responsible for paying that dividend to the shareholder they borrowed the shares from in the first place.

I typically don’t short stocks. One of my very first investments was shorting Air Canada all the way to bankruptcy back in about 2004. Since then though, I haven’t shorted a single stock. Maybe I’m an optimist, but I just don’t get excited about betting against a company. I’d rather try to find an undervalued gem than bet against an overvalued stock. Sometimes though, I get the itch to short a stock that is just so ridiculously overvalued. Luckily for me, I can just blog about my picks and save my capital for buying shares.

1. Netflix

I’ve wrote before about how I’m not really a long term fan of Netflix. I think the cost of their streaming service will only go up. I think there is no way they can maintain the subscriber growth the market has priced in for the stock. Their price earnings ratio is over 80. Their net margins are under 10%, meaning they don’t have a lot of room to stomach any sort of cost increases. Netflix hogs a whole bunch of bandwidth, meaning their success depends on the telecom operators and the internet service providers.

The company has a book value of $5.50, meaning the shares trade at more than 40 times the value of the company. That is ridiculously expensive, and you know the stock will get absolutely hammered with one earnings miss.

2. Amazon

The Thousandaire stock pick of the day yesterday is horribly expensive from every metric. The company recorded net margins of only 3.6% during the busiest quarter of their history. Everybody you know already buys stuff online, so how long can the company maintain double digit revenue growth? A price earnings ratio of 68 and a price to book ratio of almost 14. For the market to maintain these valuations requires Amazon beating the stuffing out of expectations quarter after quarter. They’ll stumble sooner or later.

3. Any Gold Company That Doesn’t Make Money

Gold is at a record high. If a gold company can’t make money at this point, what are they going to do once the price goes down?

If you do some research, you can easily find half a dozen.

4. Sprint Nextel

If the massive debt load isn’t reason enough for you to be pessimistic about this dog, the company hasn’t made money since 2006. A quick Google search shows that there are all sorts of people who hate Sprint more than I had attractive redheads who turn me down.

If the AT&T and T-Mobile merger goes through, Sprint becomes a distant third player in the tough U.S. wireless market. Almost half of Sprint’s book value is made up of intangible assets, assets a value investor doesn’t value very highly.

5. Sirius/XM

A massive debt load combined with the large number of outstanding shares makes this company ripe for a 10:1 share consolidation. Usually after a company consolidates shares, the stock trades downwards for a while after. Even though the satellite radios are built right into new cars, ipods make listening to commercial free music easy. It turns out the whole world agrees with me on this one, since it’s by far the most shorted stock on the Nasdaq.

Any stocks you hate readers? Do you want to short something into oblivion?  Share it in the comments.

 

So I’ve been hearing a lot about this Financial Blogging Conference, being held in the windy city of Chicago during the first weekend of October. At first I dismissed the idea of going, figuring that the conference is only for the big boys. The more and more I think about it though, the more I want to go. The longer I spend in this business and the more I get to know other bloggers, the more I want to meet them and hang out with them in real life.

My goal for the rest of the year is to make enough money off this blog to go to Chicago for 5 days or so, giving me some time to wander around the city and going to the conference. I figure $1500 will be enough to do it. Plus, I could be in town for the Blue Jays’ final series of the season, against the Chicago White Sox.

Next step is to try to get the time off work and to start earning the $1500 I need to cover expenses. So yes, you guys may see some more sponsored posts.

Random Thing That Irritated Me This Week

I hate people who brag about how little sleep they get.

One of my chip customers was bragging about how he only gets 4-6 hours per night. He even went as far to point out how much more productive he was than others who get their whole 8 hours every night. He works at a gas station. The only reason he can afford his own house is because he lives in the middle of nowhere where a house rents for $400 per month. I think he spends his additional waking hours smoking weed. So good for him.

Getting less sleep isn’t really that good if someone doesn’t accomplish anything.

Random Thing I Enjoyed This Week

I met the redhead for the first time since she rejected me. Well, sort of.

I got my haircut on Tuesday. The hairdresser is in the only mall in town, where the main anchor tenant is a grocery store. I went into the grocery store to pick up some lunch. Being a former grocery store employee, I like to wander around grocery stores and check out their displays, new products, and so on. I know, I’m so cool.

Anyway, I walk towards the bakery, seeing a whole bunch of kids getting a tour. I remember touring a grocery store when I was about that age, so I thought that was pretty cool. The kids start walking toward me, and their teacher, bringing up the rear, suddenly appears around the corner. Guess who it was?

If you guessed the redhead, you’d be very warm.

So she looks up, makes eye contact with me, and instantly looks down towards her shoes. She was clearly embarrassed. This amused me.

Song That I Like And Therefore You Should Too

Let’s go with a song that is ridiculously fun to play on Rock Band. Sorry Young and Thrifty, I’m not talking about that stupid Friday song. It’s Jimmy Eat World kids.

I dare you not to play air guitar during that solo about two thirds of the way through.

Simpsons Quote Of The Week

Homer: Son, when you participate in sporting events, it’s not whether you win or lose. It’s how drunk you get.

Sports TV You Should Be Watching This Week

I’m watching Shark Tank while I type this post.

For those of you unfamiliar, Shark Tank is the American version of Dragon’s Den, going as far as having both Kevin O’Leary and Robert Herjavec as sharks. It’s not quite as good as Dragon’s Den, but it’s pretty much the same thing, so I’d recommend it.

I’m starting to get bored of NCAA basketball. The MLB season starts at the end of the week, so that’ll be fun for at least two of us.

Blogging Snack of The Week

I usually don’t get too excited about new products that my employer introduces, but I am for this one. I am almost convinced they’re going to make me fat again.

They’re Rold Gold Chocolate Covered Pretzels, and they are more addictive than crack. The mixture of the sweetness of the chocolate and the saltiness of the pretzels is wonderful. We cracked one open today during work and it didn’t last the whole day. I think they’re only a limited time product, so run to your local grocery store and stock up today.

As for the weight loss, I had a good week this week, dropping down to 231.4. That’s over 4 pounds this week and over 37 in total. I’m only 11 pounds from my goal, which I figure I can get done in about 3 weeks. I still have a little belly, but it’s barely visible over my shirt. I’m so sexy.

Babe Loosely Related To Finance

Rather than a picture, let’s go with a video this time. These sexy babes are brought to you by Rachelle from Landlord Rescue.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9LBQZ3nxCU&feature=player_embedded

That might be the best ad I’ve ever seen for a house. Those dirty Aussies!

 

Oh Right, Time For Links

I’m not a big fan of I Will Teach You To Be Rich, because most posts make me feel like I’m reading an infomercial. This week though, Ramit posted a terrific guest post on Avoiding Paying For Credentials You Don’t Really Need.

Money Smarts posted a review on Interactive Brokers. The biggest appeal for me is the ability to trade on the European or Japanese markets.

Jim from Retire Happy Blog debunks the myth of half of your earnings going to taxes.

I think The Financial Blogger is a little bit attracted to his business partner. There are very few people I’d be willing to partner with, so I end up trying to do most things myself. This arrangement works out quite good for me.

Andrew Hallam talks about how ridiculously easy it is to become licensed to sell mutual funds in the U.S.

I liked six ways to make extra money, posted on Financial Highway.

Brip Blap explains why everyone should want to be wealthy. His post didn’t have an awesome picture of a Wal-Mart greeter though.

Lazy Man and Money lists the 15 most profitable movies of all time. Surprisingly, Spice World wasn’t one of the movies.

And finally, some dude in Nunavut dug up a dead body and made sweet love to it.

Carnivals I Was In This Week

I was in the totally money carnival over at Money Mamba.

I also participated in the carnival of personal finance at Fiscal Fizzle.

I was once again in the Canadian finance carnival.

That makes three carnivals. Aren’t you all proud of me?

Have a good week everyone.

 

Guest Post by Paula at AffordAnything.org

Well, the title is not entirely true. (Okay, it’s a complete lie.) I haven’t learned EVERYTHING about money from Homer Simpson. But I’ve certainly learned a lot from watching television’s most famous cartoon dad.

Lesson #1: Either Get Ahead at Work or Concentrate on Side Income

Homer’s day job is Nuclear Safety Inspector at Springfield Nuclear Power Plant, but he’s mostly ignored by his superiors, and it’s clear he won’t be getting a raise from miserly boss, Montgomery Burns. So rather than stress himself out with his responsibility at his day job (who cares if there’s a meltdown at the plant?), he commits his extra energy into his own entrepreneurial side ventures.

Over the years, Homer has moonlighted as a clown impersonator, launched a snow plow company, gone to space as a NASA astronaut, sang in a barbershop quartet, smuggled beer in prohibition zones, and invented a reclining toilet.

Plenty of people have great opportunities to move up the ladder at their current job, or head to a bigger and better company in their same line of work. If you’re one of these people, your time might be best spent getting ahead within your field. A young associate at a law firm, for example, could probably make more money moving up the ladder than he could writing blog posts about Homer Simpson.

But if you’re a graduate from a liberal arts major at a state university who earned chump change as a newspaper reporter (like yours truly), you might be better off trying to launch your own side business. True, the “entrepreneur” myth is that business ownership = instant wealth. (Not true!) But this will at least give you multiple streams of income, so you have something to fall back on when you get laid off in the next recession — or extra cash to splurge on a reclining toilet.

Lesson #2: It’s More Fulfilling to Give Than to Spend On Yourself

Homer’s not exactly saintly — he sleeps through church — but when push comes to shove, we see Homer sacrificing for his family. Although he once won a ride on the Duff Beer blimp, the opportunity of a lifetime for a Duff fanatic like Homer, he sold his ticket to raise the money so his daughter Lisa could enter a contest. When he bought a winning lottery ticket but couldn’t admit that he won (for a complicated number of reasons), he spent the money on items for his family — a washer and drier, kitchen appliances — rather than for himself, and placed the goods in places where Marge and the kids would “find” the treasure.

Lesson here? ‘Tis better to share your wealth with others. Don’t get taken advantage of — and let yourself enjoy a Duff beer! — but don’t get so caught up in money that you forget how much a contest entry, or a new blender, could benefit the people you love.

Lesson #3: You Don’t Need to Spend a Lot to Have Fun — A Donut and A Hammock Will Do

Homer is the ultimate fun-lovin’ guy, but he’s not dropping major dollars to have fun. You never see him dash off to Vegas for a weekend, or regularly dine at fancy restaurants. He enjoys the simple things: a donut, some cheap beer, laying in a hammock on a sunny day. He enjoys life as much as the next guy — and saves his hard-earned (okay, soft-earned) cash.

This is a Guest Post from Paula at AffordAnything.org — the blog that teaches you to live richly + savor life. If you really loved it, won’t you please Tweet it or Like it on Facebook?

© 2012 Financial Uproar Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site