Fortunately for me, I’m nobody’s parent.

I know all sorts of people, most of which are my age or even younger, who have already pushed out a kid or two. And hey, that’s great. I plan on having some little Uproars running underfoot someday, mostly because having an empty little mind to fill up with whatever I want is quite enticing. But at this point in my life, I really can’t imagine being solely responsible for a little person. Besides, I’m a long way away from that step. First up, getting a girl to go out with me. And then, well, you can probably get where this is going.

Good thing I follow Man vs. Debt on the Twitter, or else I wouldn’t have stumbled upon a great article over at CNN, all about the cost of raising a kid. That’s only the one kid, not several. In case you’re wondering, the cost is $226,920 for a middle class, 2 income family. There’s no mention if that cost goes down if you make Junior a sister, so let’s assume that a typical family will pay a half a million bucks for the privilege of replacing the parents.

There’s so many things wrong with this number I don’t even know where to begin.

This number was tabulated by the Department of Agriculture. What the hell does the Department of Agriculture know about the cost of raising a kid? Shouldn’t they stick to, oh I don’t know, FARMING? Stay tuned for the next report from that department, on the status of medicare.

And hey, did you know that the cost of everything has gone up over the last 10 years? Oh yeah, this is the first I’m hearing of it too. The cost of having kids is 40% higher than 10 years ago, even though inflation has averaged 2.5-3% over those 10 years. So in reality, it costs less than 10% more to raise a kid than 10 years ago, since inflation compounds annually.

But wait, there’s more! The article does a handy job of breaking down the the numbers. The biggest expense, checking in at 31% of the total cost is housing. It costs $69,660 to keep a roof over Junior’s head. Divide that by 18 years and you get an extra $3870 per year to house a bedroom that would most likely just sit empty if there wasn’t a kid to occupy it. Or maybe you live in some sort of fantasy world where people don’t have extra bedrooms in their house.

And then there’s transportation. The report claims it costs a parent $1716 in extra transportation costs to drive to and from soccer practice. Assuming 50 cents per kilometer cost (yep, my Canadian is showing again) of driving, the kid caused the parent to drive an extra 3432 km. Apparently every parent lives out in the middle of nowhere.

There’s more that I can point out about the report, but I just won’t bother. Let’s take a step back and look at the big picture.

First, there’s the problem with average, especially in areas that have higher and lower costs of living. What exactly is an average income for 2 working parents? Parents who live in New York City or San Francisco probably make far larger salaries than the plain folks of Des Moines Iowa. They enroll their kids in more expensive stuff and feed them more expensive food, since the cost of living is generally much higher in those places. Meanwhile, the folks in Des Moines are so bored that they get drunk and go out to the country to tip some cows.

Step one to get below the average is to live somewhere cheap.

You can figure out where I’m going with this. Kids love Kraft Dinner, yet their parents feed them the all organic substitute from Whole Foods (made with real goat cheese, yum!) because parents can be incredibly douchey. In Canada, every kid is enrolled in hockey, often before they can skate without falling over, because they’re the next Sidney Crosby. Most parents drive two next to new cars, paying interest on both of them, because they bow to the peer pressure of driving something nice. The bottom line is that parenting, like many things in life, costs about what you decide it’ll cost.

What’s the point of reports like this one? Is it to scare people into not having kids if they can’t afford it? Is it to encourage parents to spend on their children? I don’t get it.

 

  • Rosstaylor999

    Hey Nelson – I have seven kids – four of my own, three I inherited, and maybe more I don’t know about. Four have gone through university (one is a persistent little bugger though now doing a Masters and then med school. 

    Our elldest daughter just got called to the Ontario bar last week, and her journey included two years law school in London, England when she could not get into law school in Canada. (Mucho $$ for that)

    I would not know how to begin counting how much they cost to raise – nor do I want to. I can tell you the responsibility never ends – it’s not like they turn 18 and you throw them from the nest and hope they fly.Waiting in the wings I have two 16 year olds and an 18 year old who (thank heavens) is taking a gap year to find herself in waitressing, busking, and a trip to India and New Zealand in between. After she finds herself over there she may settle into photo journalism.Yes it is true that raising kids is expensive – but just as they say small kids = small problems – big kids = big problems (or big $ take your pick)I would not change anything if I had to go back and do it all again – but effective parenthood puts a strain not only on the finances – but also it can consume your persona (so many parents live vicariously through their kids); make you boring, and it can define your life and where and how you spend your time if you are not careful.To new parents, I would suggest having only one or two children – only partly for financial reasons. You will be able to give fewer kids the attention they deserve, while still finding a balance in your own life.

  • Rosstaylor999

    Hey Nelson – I have seven kids – four of my own, three I inherited, and maybe more I don’t know about. Four have gone through university (one is a persistent little bugger though now doing a Masters and then med school. 

    Our elldest daughter just got called to the Ontario bar last week, and her journey included two years law school in London, England when she could not get into law school in Canada. (Mucho $$ for that)

    I would not know how to begin counting how much they cost to raise – nor do I want to. I can tell you the responsibility never ends – it’s not like they turn 18 and you throw them from the nest and hope they fly.Waiting in the wings I have two 16 year olds and an 18 year old who (thank heavens) is taking a gap year to find herself in waitressing, busking, and a trip to India and New Zealand in between. After she finds herself over there she may settle into photo journalism.Yes it is true that raising kids is expensive – but just as they say small kids = small problems – big kids = big problems (or big $ take your pick)I would not change anything if I had to go back and do it all again – but effective parenthood puts a strain not only on the finances – but also it can consume your persona (so many parents live vicariously through their kids); make you boring, and it can define your life and where and how you spend your time if you are not careful.To new parents, I would suggest having only one or two children – only partly for financial reasons. You will be able to give fewer kids the attention they deserve, while still finding a balance in your own life.

    • Anonymous

      I’d only want one or two kids. I cannot imagine how guys like you do it with tons of them. I’d want to kill them all, all the time.

      And that’s true about taking care of kids after they turn 18. I lived in my parents basement until I turned 25, for very cheap rent. It’s part of the reason why I’ve done well financially.

      • RossTaylorMoney

        Haha – put my commentabove in the context of a guy who used to openly declare he never wanted any kids! I would have been happy to be the benevolent uncle.

        But much as snot nosed noisy kids can annoy you today – EVERYTHING changes when they are yours – and don’t worry – thoughts of infanticide will disappear instantly.

        And they eventually stop crying, and their noses stop running, and they are way cool. Find me on Facebook, and you’ll see pics of me and my kids in there – and you’ll see how great being a dad is.

  • Bagladyhiphop

    I’ve been waiting for this and the day has
    finally arrived, unfortunately.  You got
    lazy, got overly critical and shot your credibility in the proverbial
    “foot.”  This article is so “off-base” I’m
    not sure where to begin. 

    It paints you
    as someone who writes more for entertainment purposes, than actual fact
    distribution. 

     

    I’ll wait for a response, but most likely,
    one is not forthcoming and I’m dumping the subscription.  If I wanted blather and bluster like this, I’d
    watch Fox News – its easier and at least I expect it.

     

    Bob-

    • Anonymous

      Well Bob, a few things:

      1. You’ve been waiting for me to fail, at least in your eyes? That’s kind of mean, but whatever. They’re your eyes.

      2. I welcome criticism about anything I write. But please, actually find something to criticize. I think I can figure out what you might have a problem with, but I don’t actually have any idea.

      3. Do you honestly think I give two craps if you stop subscribing to my blog? Newsflash: I don’t write for you. I write about finance because I enjoy writing about finance. I try to point out where conventional wisdom is wrong. Sometimes I nail it, sometimes I swing and miss.

  • http://www.dqydj.net PKamp3

     Nelson,

    I think the article also doesn’t factor in the activities which are avoided due to having kids.  I’m thinking less vacations, less expensive restaurant trips, less bottle service at local clubs…

    … and I completely agree that their housing cost calculations are dubious.  No kids here (yet, give me time) and I have 4 bedrooms.

    -Paul

    • Anonymous

      Good point, I never thought of that.

      Also, I’d like to point out to everyone reading this that I was the FIRST EVER FOLLOW from Paul’s newly created Twitter account. I feel so special.

      • http://www.dqydj.net PKamp3

        I avoided it for so long, I’m embarrassed I finally gave into Twitter. Also, I like the icon you picked for Twitter.

  • RossTaylorMoney

    I tried to sing the bagladyhiphop’s rant to a rap beat – almost made it to the end. 

    Looks like you’re blog is off his/her Christmas card list Nelson

    • Anonymous

      Darn!

      Ross likes hip hop? I totally cannot picture you listening to it, which makes it even funnier.

  • Pingback: Black Coffee: Would You Believe My Dog Ate the First Half of this Article? « Len Penzo dot Com

  • Pingback: Best This Week In Personal Finance | Yes, I Am Cheap

   
© 2012 Financial Uproar Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site