Nelson Smith

 

Because not all of us can afford to hire someone to carry us on a rickshaw, it’s the Financial Uproar guide to buying cars. And I would know, since I’ve bought exactly one of them.

It’s been repeated so many times it’s practically cliche. You should buy a late model used car rather than the same model new. Vehicles lose a full 25% of the value once you drive them off the lot, didn’t you hear? Of course you have, since it’s been repeated by every person in the history of ever. And while you’re at it, you better buy a Toyota or a Honda, since they’re 749% more reliable than their North American brethren.

I’ll admit, I used to buy into these rules as well. I would have bought a Toyota Corolla, but my crappy little town has no Toyota dealership, and I wanted something that was new enough there’d still be some warranty attached. I also bought a leaseback, because the 4 year old Ford Focus was something like 60% cheaper than the new one. My car had low mileage, meaning there was lots of life left in it. The intent was to drive it into the ground. It’s 6 years later and I’m still driving it.

However, a lot has changed in 6 years. Those hard and fast rules I mentioned earlier? Throw them out the window. Stuff is all messed up – with one big caveat. It all depends on the model.

The difference in price between a new and a used Toyota Corolla is only a couple thousand bucks, which is only 10% or so in depreciation over a year or two. The same thing applies for all sorts of other models too, mostly the in demand foreign cars. If you’re looking for a couple year old North American car, most models can be found at a 25-40% discount compared to a new one. The reason why comes all the way back to the principles of economics. Foreign models are in demand right now, and Honda and Toyota just haven’t caught up to the demand in North America. Plus, all the various Cash for Clunkers programs took a crap-ton of used cars off the road.

If you add in super low financing rates, you get an equation that makes it awfully tempting for people to buy a new car. So they do it. For most people, buying a car involves two variables: what model and how old. If in demand models only depreciate by 10% a year, they’ll probably choose new over used. If their model of choice depreciates 25% a year, used probably has the inside track. When we look at these variables, people are logical when it comes to buying.

But then, as soon as they start to get all logical about buying, most people abandon that logic faster than North Carolina banned gay marriage. (SORTA TOPICAL!) There are two things people really screw up on when it comes to buying. One is getting stuck on a specific model, and the other is limiting their search to stuff only a few years old. Let’s start with the model.

These days, crossover SUVs are more popular than beer at a frat party. Everyone has one, including my cheap, cheap Dad. (He doesn’t read my blog because HE DOESN’T LOVE ME!) They’re like an SUV but smaller and better on fuel. They’ve got enough space to drive the rugrats to soccer practice and enough space for that one time a year your wife makes an IKEA run. (Swedish for crap, amirite?) It’s all great, except one thing. Crossovers are just minivans. If you’re willing to suck it up and buy a minivan over a crossover, you’ll save thousands of dollars. But nobody does, because it’s unmanly for a guy to drive a minivan. And because crossovers are cool.

Because we get hung up on certain models, we unnecessarily pay thousands of dollars more for a car just to buy something cool. When you shop for your next car, do some research on what models just aren’t moving. Car dealerships hate having crap on their lot, so they’ll price it to move.

Secondly, we need to stop with this fallacy that new or next to new cars are the only vehicles that are reliable. Cars aren’t like that older lady who used to be hot but now isn’t – they don’t deteriorate simply by existing. They deteriorate from being used, not from sitting in the garage. Which means, from a mechanical point of view, a car with 70,000km is the same, no matter if it’s 2, 5 or 10 years old. It’s the amount of wear and tear on a car that matters, not the age. As creepy 30 year olds who want to date 19 year old girls say, “age is only a number.”

Yes, older cars with very few kilometers on them are hard to find. But there’s huge advantages to buying one. Assuming 20% depreciation, here’s what a $25,000 car would be worth over a decade:

Year Value
0 25,000
1 20,000
2 16,000
3 12,800
4 10,240
5 8,192
6 6,554
7 5,243
8 4,194
9 3,355
10 2,684

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Look guys, I made a spreadsheet. Tell everyone.

Even if you buy the proverbial lemon, you can still fork out thousands of dollars in repairs (and rent a car in the meantime) and still be tens of thousands of dollars ahead of the guy who bought the same car new. You’ll pay a premium for a car with low kilometers, but it’s still considerably cheaper than the alternatives.

Look for cars that old people used to drive, but they’re now dead. This sounds bad, but hear me out. Old people drive rarely, at a very low speed, maintain their cars well, and are likely to have the resources to store the car in a garage. That’s the golden ticket of buying an older car that’s barely been used. Just be respectful and wait until the funeral is done before you ask to test drive Grandpa’s ride.

The advantages don’t stop there. If you drive an older car, you don’t feel the need to make every single little repair. If your car gets a small dent, you’ll just keep on driving. Plus, you can save all sorts of money by not needing collision coverage on your insurance. All you have to insure is the other guy, since your car will be cheap enough that you can afford to take that risk.

I haven’t touched leasing, because that’s the equivalent of lighting your money on fire. Don’t do that, unless you have a way to write it off. Even then, I’m not entirely sold on the benefits of leasing.

To summarize, buy something old with low mileage. If you really want something newer, a brand new car might be better than a used one. If you do buy something new (or close to new) though, can you just admit vanity plays a big role in that decision?

 

Now, don’t be alarmed by the title of this post. Nelly loves him some Twitter, and I’m not about to quit anytime soon. My feed has devolved from delivering actual financial content to a bunch of inappropriate jokes… kinda like this blog. Hey, you’re the sucker who still reads this thing. It’s like a train wreck or that slutty trashed girl at the bar – you don’t want to look, but you just can’t take your eyes off the carnage. Also, one of those things you want to sleep with.

Even after that paragraph, I’m going to pimp my twitter account. A full 21% of the tweets are funny. And no, that’s not exaggerated like I’ve been known to do while describing the size of my penis. (BIGGER THAN YOUR HEAD!)

Some people though, actually post content on their Twitter. Some use it exclusively as a tool to mention posts by other bloggers about every 36 minutes, which gets annoying after about the 4th time you check your Twitter feed. This is an obvious attempt to get other bloggers to notice you. It’s the Twitter equivalent of two drunk girls making out because they know guys like it. There’s a fine line between posting interesting links and just being annoying.

For the most part though, Twitter is just a way to waste time. I’m not totally against wasting time, I pretty much pissed away a whole weekend playing video games and watching baseball. All work and no play will make you a miserable person, and that’s not going to get anyone’s panties off. I fully support your right to waste time, no matter what you like doing. Like ogling pictures of chocolate cookies? Knock yourself out. Just keep your hands where I can see them.

Recently, I stumbled upon a website while surfing around the interwebs. It’s funny how that happened. This site was about the usage of Twitter, where this graph told me what I’ve always suspected.

Source: http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter

Notice anything? The 5 busiest hours of Twitter are between 11am and 3pm EST. The majority of Twitter users (and North Americans in general) tend to work jobs that keep them at the office between 9am and 5pm. Is it a coincidence that Twitter is the most active during the work day? Of course not, it just confirms what we already knew. People are goofing off on Twitter instead of working.

Even though you all read the best personal finance blog in the history of ever (TM pending due to laziness) you’re probably not all superstars at work. Don’t worry though, you totally are. It’s everyone else I’m talking about. Anyway, as I was saying, everyone but you may not be exactly rocking it at work. Hey, that’s not such a bad thing, many jobs are set up where initiative just isn’t rewarded.

For many office jobs, (especially union jobs) seniority has everything to do with who gets the next promotion, and work quality does not. Or, you might be stuck in a rut, just putting in the motions because you’re comfortable. Hell, you might have already mentally checked out, just waiting for your boss to fire your ass so you can collect that sweet, sweet unemployment check.

Do you see how this gets back to Twitter? If you’re wasting time on Twitter, you’re not exactly being productive.

For most people reading this blog, getting a promotion and a raise is by far the best thing you could ever do to help your finances. As long as you don’t give into lifestyle inflation, that raise can go straight to paying off debt or investing for the future, depending on what stage of the personal finance journey you’re on. You have to cut a lot of little things out of your life to make the equivalent of a $5000 raise worth of cuts. That’s a lot of generic brand Kraft Dinner and homemade coffee.

Just about every white collar worker with a pulse can figure this out. Yeah, office politics weigh into these decisions, but it’s usually only slackers and assholes that make that excuse. Generally, if you work harder, you’ll get promoted. We all know this, yet we all piss away all sorts of time during the day. Twitter is only one culprit, there are a million more. How many of you are reading this while you’re supposed to be working?

I’ve solved this problem, albeit unintentionally. I have a job where I only get paid to be productive. I only get paid for the chips I sell. When I’m sitting on my ass updating Twitter, or ogling that cute cashier at some store, I’m not getting paid a nickel. It’s why my real life friends can attest to my annoyance when they call during the day. (Yes, I have real life friends. Shocking, I know.) For every minute I’m slacking off, that’s one extra minute I have to work. The longer I have to work, the less my hourly wage ends up being.

Without starting your own business, there really isn’t much you can do to put yourself in the same situation I have. So what should you do? I have an idea. It’s shocking, but it just might work.

You could work harder.

I’ve worked at enough different places I can attest to how easy it is to get ahead if you’re just willing to put in the effort. Most people are interested in exchanging just enough effort in exchange for a decent salary and a 2.5% raise each year. Companies are willing to oblige because if they pay you $50,000 per year, it’s practically guaranteed you’re worth much more than $50,000 per year. If you weren’t, you’d be down the road.

Making more money is the best way to help your financial situation. It takes effort though. Screw a sideline business, spend some time being really good at your main business. It’ll pay dividends at some point. But, you should still follow me on Twitter. I’ll cry if you don’t.

 

 

Do you guys know what rhymes with debate? Masturbate. HEY. I NEVER CLAIMED TO BE MATURE.

Anyway, I know that literally every other blogger in history has done this post. I’m altogether too lazy to check back to confirm this, so you’ll just have to take my word for it. Why do I think I have something extra to add to this already overwrought  debate? Well, first off, I GUARANTEE my post will contain more penis jokes than all those other ones. Besides, I’m 92% smarter and 104% more attractive than all the others who have previously tackled this. And 394% more humble. It’s a very complicated formula. I wouldn’t attempt it.

Anyhoo, back to the debate. Us Canucks don’t typically have 30 year mortgages, 25 year loans are much more common. Some people are ambitious and take 15 year mortgages, but a 20 year mortgage is the norm for people who are trying to more aggressively pay down their debt. Once we get to the end of the post though, you’ll see how the numbers work even for Canadian mortgages. That’s a bigger tease than the cover of Hustler magazine. (I buy it for the articles)

Let’s run some hypotheticals, bitches!

Purchase price: $300,000
Interest Rate: 4%
30 year mortgage payment: $1426
15 year mortgage payment: $2214
Total interest paid 15 year: $98,540
Total interest paid 30 year: $213,560

It’s official, the 15 year wins, right? Over those extra 15 years, you’d save an extra $115,020 in interest if you’d just stop being a slacker and pay off your place quicker. Of course, you won’t be able to afford as much house to begin with if you do take out a 15 year loan, but that’s okay. How many people do you know who live in place that’s way the hell too big anyway? Many of us could easily downsize to a smaller place.

But wait. Let’s assume that our imaginary home buyer can afford both the 30 year and 15 year mortgages. He’s raking in the cash, probably doing boob jobs for that Heidi chick from The Hills. It becomes a choice of preference, rather than necessity. Let’s also assume, just for this example, that if he takes the 15 year mortgage, our hypothetical buyer isn’t going to have much room left over to contribute to his future. Our hypothetical buyer is also a guy, because boys rule and girls drool, at least according to that 6 year old I just talked to.

But, that’s okay, because he’ll have a paid off house, right? That’s true, but that’s all he’ll have, since Mr. Hypothetical is putting all his cash towards his house. We won’t look at whether his house goes up in value or not, because our other hypothetical buyer will also see their house go up in value. We’ll pretend hypothetical buyer B is a girl, to save some grace with my dwindling female readership.

Buyer A pours all his cash into his house, so for 15 years he doesn’t invest an extra dime. But, from year 15 to year 30 he’s going to have all sorts of money to invest – $2214 per month to be exact. After 15 years of investing $2214 per month at an 8% return, hypothetical buyer A ends up with a nest egg of $779,087. He also ends up with a fully paid for house. Assuming he bought the place when he was 30, he’s not sitting bad as a 60 year old. Well done, hypothetical buyer A. Your grandkids will undoubtedly squander your inheritance.

Back to buyer B. She takes the 30 year mortgage, along with the $1426 monthly payment. Every month, she’s got an extra $788 compared to our other buyer. She thinks about going out and spending it on shoes, makeup, clothes and whatnot, but that would be silly. So she invests it in her brokerage account, and uses glimpses of cleavage to get guys to buy her those things. Like our other buyer, she gets an 8% return, but she manages to maintain her’s over a 30 year period.

After her extended mortgage is over, she has investments worth $1.157M. She’s got our first buyer beat, and beat handily. She will leave a much larger estate for her grandkids to squander. How does she end up with so much more than the first guy? Compound interest, stupid.

Compound interest works really well when you start early. By the time the first buyer even begins to invest, buyer B has over $277,000 already invested. It would appear that he gains ground as time goes on, but buyer B just has too much of a head start. Besides, after the mortgage is paid off, buyer B can afford to invest just as much as buyer A.

Americans can deduct their mortgage interest, meaning the extra interest buyer B pays over the life of her loan is mitigated. Canadians can’t deduct their mortgage interest, but interest rates are so low right now that maintaining a mortgage and investing at the same time is a form of leveraging. Mortgage debt is typically the best way for people to borrow money, since the bank has built in collateral, and because most mortgages in Canada are insured by the federal government.

With Canadians, this exercise gets a little more complicated, because we renew our mortgages, usually every 5 years, and there’s no guarantee that we’ll get attractive mortgage rates when we do. Generally too, the 5 year fixed mortgage rate up here is about equal to the rate of return you can get from a basket of low risk debt.

Once you even out the results over 25 or 30 years though, the return on equities will be higher than the return on fixed income. That’s just the nature of investing. Since equities are prone to knee-jerk reactions sometimes, they will have higher rates of return over time. That’s the nature between risk and reward. Long term investors are rewarded for taking additional risk. Short term investors are not, which is why they shouldn’t be taking said risk.

If you are one of those people who feels the need to pay off the mortgage quicker, might I suggest an alternative? Take out the 30 year loan, and make sure you get a mortgage that allows you to make prepayments of 20% per year without a penalty. Then you can make your small mortgage payments, save up some cash on the side, and then put big chunks down directly on principal. You’ll save interest, plus this strategy give you extra flexibility.

Also, a longer amortization is ideal because of inflation. As time goes on, a $1426 mortgage payment is worth less and less in real terms. Inflation slowly eats away at the value of the payment, meaning each payment gets just a little bit more affordable. Well, assuming your salary also moves up with inflation.

Now that I’ve straightened this up, you’ll have to excuse me. I’m off to stand outside the window of the house buyer B bought. Has anyone seen my binoculars?

 

 

The title of this post was inspired by a famous Mark Twain quote, credited to the author back in 1897. I’m at the cutting edge of pop culture here, people.

On April 26th, after the stock markets had closed for the day, Amazon (AMZN) released earnings for their first quarter, which ended on March 31st. The online retailer’s revenue rose 34% year over year, from a little less than $10B to more than $13B. The stock surged, rising more than 16% in trading the next day. The market loved the results, they beat analyst projections, and the stock soared as a result.

Once you did deeper into the numbers though, it’s a little puzzling why the market reacted so strongly. Compared to the same quarter last year, Amazon’s numbers were weaker in just about every way. Sure, revenue was up, but profit was way down, dropping from 44 cents per share to 28 cents per share. Gross margins were basically flat (dropping from 24.1% to 23.9%) but operating margins got crushed, falling from 2.02% to 1.45%.

Amazon’s margins fell for two reasons. They’re investing in some new distribution centers, a short term cost that hopefully has long term benefits. The other is because of the increase of sales in the Kindle Fire, Amazon’s answer to the iPad. The Fire is widely speculated to sell at a loss, something Amazon hopes to make up by the profits on the e-books Fire owners will buy. It’s a model that’s popular in the video game and printer world, so it’s not like Amazon is blazing a new trail.

Amazon has been fighting a full scale war with traditional bricks and mortar retailers. Amazon has the advantage of not having physical stores, which have a way of increasing operating costs. The stock price of traditional retailers sure is giving you the message that Amazon is winning the war. Over the past year, Best Buy (BBY) shares are down 32%. Radio Shack (RSH) has seen its shares decline 68% over the same amount of time. Even book retailer Barnes and Noble (BKS) was struggling until fairly recently, when Microsoft announced they were buying Barnes and Noble’s e-reader business, which sent the stock soaring.

I know what you’re thinking, and I know it’s dirty. STOP THAT. I also know what you’re thinking about electronics retailers. They’re getting their asses kicked by Amazon, because electronics have turned into a commodity, where the lowest cost retailer wins. There’s no need to go into the store and go check out all the new TVs, since all the TVs these days are the same. Who needs to go into a store to test out an iPad, when your friends already each have one? I do, but that’s because I have no friends. Sad face. :(

For these reasons, many people have started on a campaign almost celebrating the end of traditional retail as we know it. Why would anybody go to the store? With Amazon, you can compare all the options while sitting on your ass, and have your purchase shipped right to your house. It’s the lazy man’s way of buying, and it’s only going to get more popular.

Or is it? As you can probably guess from this awkwardly titled post, I don’t agree with the assertion that traditional retail is basically dead. Here’s why.

Sales Tax Advantage

One of the big advantages Amazon has over traditional retailers is Amazon doesn’t charge local sales taxes. This is changing, as Amazon has recently announced deals with California, Texas and Nevada to start collecting and remitting state sales taxes, starting this year. This erases a 5-8% advantage Amazon had on retail prices compared to regular ol’ stores.

Amazon had revenues of $48B in 2011. If we assume the average sales tax is 7%, that’s almost $3.5B worth of sales taxes that the states are missing out on. You better believe, in today’s world of tight government budgets, the states want a piece of that pie. Suddenly, Amazon’s cheaper price has become just a little more expensive for consumers.

Demographics

For the most part, baby boomers aren’t very good at the internet. You have to show them how to cut and paste. They download all sorts of stupid toolbars and they still use Internet Explorer. And, for the most part, they don’t buy anything from Amazon.

Older people are much more likely to go buy their electronics at a Best Buy or Walmart than they are to spend that cash online. It’s the way they’ve bought things their entire life, and they’re not about to change. Also, older people still believe some ambitious hacker is just waiting to steal their credit card information if they post it online. You buy all your electronics online. Your parents don’t. Don’t underestimate the amount they spend or their reluctance to change.

Where’s The Growth?

Amazon took the e-book business and turned it from a cottage industry into the next big thing, and has leveraged that into massive success. Where’s the next big thing for Amazon?

They’re not going to expand into furniture, or appliances, or even groceries. There’s rumblings they’re going to get into the daily deals business, (like Groupon) but there’s no way that’s a game changer. What can Amazon get into that’s going to fuel the next stage of growth? What can online retailing in general get into that’ll expand their overall presence in any significant way? I have no idea.

People Don’t Want To Wait

Approximately 40% of Best Buy’s retail purchases are picked up in the nearest store. People go online, buy what they’re looking for, and then head on over to the nearest store and pick it up. That’s a niche that Amazon will never be able to capture from Best Buy or any of their traditional retailing cousins.

We’re an impatient society. How many times have you clicked on a Youtube video, and then got pissed off when you had to wait longer than 5 seconds for it to start playing? I know I have. Some people are willing to wait for Amazon to ship. Some people aren’t. There’s a market created by these people.

Look, I’m not arguing that online retail isn’t here to stay, or that it isn’t a huge drag against companies like Best Buy and Radio Shack. Amazon is doing their best to drive prices down, yet traditional retailers are still holding their own. If you look past Best Buy’s recent write-offs, their margins are actually better than Amazon’s.

Amazon is the giant gorilla in the room. I’m not that excited about Best Buy’s shares at this point, I think there’s a lot more pain before things get better. Radio Shack, on the other hand, is much more interesting. Look for a much more detailed post on Radio Shack at some point in the future. In the meanwhile, just remember that traditional retail isn’t going away. Feel free to go to the store and browse. Oh, and buy something too.

 

According to the powerful and attractive PK from Don’t Quit Your Day Job, this link dump should be Cinco De Mayo themed. It’s not the worst idea I’ve ever heard, with one big caveat – I have no flippin’ idea what Cinco De Mayo is. Wikipedia, help a brother out:

Cinco de Mayo (Spanish for “fifth of May”) is a celebration held on May 5. It is celebrated nationwide in the United States and regionally in Mexico, primarily in the state of Puebla, where the holiday is called El Día de la Batalla de Puebla (English: The Day of the Battle of Puebla). The date is observed in the United States as a celebration of Mexican heritage and pride, and to commemorate the cause of freedom and democracy during the first years of the American Civil War.

Now I can see why we’ve never heard of this day in Canada. We have no Mexicans. Okay, that’s an exaggeration, there’s obviously a few, but you Americans have all sorts of them. PK tells me it’s like St. Patrick’s Day, but instead of celebrating the Irish by getting completely wasted, they celebrate the Mexicans by getting completely wasted. Sounds like the exact opposite of a holiday I’d like.

There should be a holiday where we all sit around, eat pizza and chips, drink Slurpees and just listen as I pass on my pearls of wisdom. I decree it will be called Nelson Day, and we will celebrate it instead of Grandparents’ Day. There will be no presents, and it will be a somber occasion. After I lecture for the afternoon, I will choose one lucky young woman to be my mistress for the year. Many women will compete for this prize, but I will only pick one. (Sometimes two. Giggity.)

Song I Like And Therefore You Should Too

I have been listening to that stupid Call Me Maybe song for the last two weeks. I cannot stop. Can you guys plan some sort of intervention to help me kick this habit?

One of the guys from The Beastie Boys died a couple days ago, and I may have made a joke about it on the Twitter. I REGRET NOTHING. If I die an untimely death, I expect all of you to make bad jokes about it too.

Simpsons Quote

Homer: How is education supposed to make me feel smarter? Besides, every time I learn something new, it pushes some old stuff out of my brain. Remember when I took that home winemaking course, and I forgot how to drive?

Gambling Is Fun

The longer we go with this category, the more we all realize I suck at this. It was another 1-2 week last time, which is really hurting my chances to get back to respectability.

The over/under of the Blues/Kings game is 4.5, a total that’s just begging me to take the over. I’m also taking the under (8.5 runs) for the Texas/Cleveland game, since Yu Darvish is the best thing to come from Japan since kinky anime porn. Rounding out my picks will be Miami, minus the 8 points, as they should be able to easily punt the Knicks.

Overall record: 34-47-3

A Post You Might Have Missed

Once upon a time, a long, long time ago, I wrote content that was both compelling and it didn’t make fun of anybody about anything… Yeah, that never happened. Still, I can dream.

I found something nice and controversial for this week’s old post. I’m not such a big fan of unions. In fact, I believe they’re a relic of years’ past. Go click through and leave an angry pro-union comment.

The More You Know

Two pastings from Wikipedia in one blog post? I’m pushing the boundaries of good taste, but I DON’T CARE.

During World War I, recruitment marches or snowball marches to Sydney were a feature of volunteer recruiting drives for the Australian Imperial Force in rural New South Wales, Australia. Between October 1915 and February 1916, nine marches were held starting from various points in the state; the most notable was the first march from Gilgandra, known as the Cooee march. There was also a similar march in south-eastern Queensland. In 1918, in an effort to promote recruitment, another march was staged, but this was less spontaneous and the marchers in fact traveled by train.

Random Australian aside: it turns out they don’t appreciate it when you ask them if a dingo ate their baby. The Aussies are clearly a miserable people, since that joke is hilarious.

Dirty Word In Words With Friends

New player Joelaw hit it out of the park, playing ‘feces’ with one of his very first moves. You’ve set the bar high Joe.

If you want all your non-sexual dreams to come true, my user is nelsmi.

Babe Loosely Related To Finance

It appears Facebook will start trading in a couple weeks. This means I finally have to put some thought into this week’s girl.

I’m not normally into chicks who work out a lot, because I’m already weak enough, I don’t need to ogle a girl who can kick my ass. But I went to wrestling on Friday night, so what the hell. Trish Stratus for your ogling purposes, gentlemen. I do enjoy the glasses look. Remember that ladies.

Time For Links

I’m going to give the much coveted top spot to the sexpots from Control Your Cash, who surpassed their usual excellence this week by taking a steaming dump on those work from home websites. I know it’s a good post when the first feeling I get after reading it is anger that I didn’t write it first.

Luckily for the squeamish of you, Darwin’s Money didn’t write about a vasectomy again. Instead, he talked about Shark Tank and why it’s a scam. I’m not sure it’s quite as bad as he does, but it’s an interesting read.

Don’t Quit Your Day Job thinks the efficient market theory is flawed. I think I got a little turned on when I read this post. I’m not sure what the author’s initials PK really stand for, but based on the quality of his posts, I’m going to assume they stand for Pretty Kick-Ass. (It works because of the hyphen.)

My internet girlfriend Young And Thrifty sold her blog to the jerks fine folks from My University Money. I will never forgive her for how she ended our awkward fling. Hussy.

My new internet girlfriend, Marissa from Thirty Sex Six Months, laments the death of a popular online magazine from its new corporate owners. Her post begs the question: should entrepreneurs sell their creation to big business, knowing big business may run it into the ground?

The nicest guy in the whole PF blog-o-net, Andrew Hallam, hates rising stock markets. If you’re still buying stocks, you should too.

This has little to do with finance, but screw it, I’m including it anyway. Melissa of Broke TO wrote an ode to living alone, which gave me the delightful mental image of Melissa’s bra on the kitchen table. I’m thinking it was a nice purple one.

I challenged the folks at Canadian Dream: Free At 45 to actually give people the nuts and bolts behind how they achieve such a high savings rate. I’ll leave it up to you to determine how well Tim delivered.

And finally, presented with a sad shake of my head, Finance Fox paid $1000 for this post.

Carnivals

Is wrestling considered a carnival?

Have a good week everyone.

© 2012 Financial Uproar Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site