Attention America:

Canada is better than you in the following ways:

1. Hockey

2. Poutine

3. Larger in size, which, as the ladies can tell you, means everything

4. Hotter women

5. Less fat women

6. Dill pickle potato chips

7. Nelson, B.C. (never been there but come on! It’s named after me)

8. Real maple syrup

9. Not every crazy carries a gun

10. Socialized medicine

The following things about America are better than Canada:

1. Weather

2. Saskatchewan

Now that we’ve cleared that up, I can move onto the post. AND WHAT A POST. As a fellow Canadian, you might feel a little inadequate when our neighbours (see what I did there?) to the south start talking about their retirement plans. They’re acting all high and mighty, with their 401Ks and their Roth IRA’s, and their extra large sizes of Wendy’s. Sometimes, you might not even have a clue what they’re talking about, probably because they aren’t ending every second sentence with ‘eh’, eh.

Well, fear no longer little one. For Nelly is here to decode this mystery. How exactly do these plans differ from the ones offered in the U.S.? Are their plans better in every way? Prepare to find out, by reading the best part of the stuff I pull out of my ass.

The 401k

The 401k is equivalent to Canada’s RRSP, with a few distinct differences. Firstly, up here, we come up with a nice acronym to describe our retirement plans, while they just used the line of the tax code which applies. How boring. It would have taken you guys like 10 minutes longer to come up with something nice, but instead you took the easy way out. No wonder your country is a pile of crap next to the all mighty Canadian empire.

Like with the RRSP, Americans enjoy tax deferred growth inside their 401k until they start to withdraw it, and then it’s taxed as normal income. In Canada, you can withdraw from your RRSP at any time, however you will pay a withholding tax if you do. Meanwhile, if you convert your RRSP to a RRIF (registered retirement income fund) then you can withdraw without paying a withholding tax. You’ll still owe tax, it’s just up to you to pay it. You have to start withdrawing from your RRIF once you hit 71.

Meanwhile, Americans can withdraw from their 401ks anytime after they turn 59 and a half for some reason. What’s up with the half year there, Americans? Like in Canada, there’s a limit to the government letting you enjoy tax deferred growth, as you have to start withdrawing once you hit 69. (giggity)

In Canada, the 2012 contribution limit is $22,970 or 18% of your employment income, whichever is lower. In the U.S., it’s been recently upped to $17,000. In both countries, you’re allowed to make up for last year’s contribution if you missed it, but the U.S. has a $5500 limit (on certain plans), where in Canada you get to keep all that precious unused contribution room.

There are all sorts of other little details, but they’re unimportant. Which plan wins, when put up side by side?

Verdict: RRSP! Higher contribution limits and longer tax deferred holding periods FOR THE WIN.

Roth IRA

Ever wonder where Canada stole the idea of the Tax Free Savings Account? (TFSA) Look no further, because I have the answer. Just like we took their football and made it better, we did the same with the Roth IRA.

It’s so similar to the TFSA it’s scary. Their contribution limit is $5000, our contribution limit is $5000. They don’t tax withdrawals when you hit retirement age, neither do we. They don’t give a tax credit for contributing, and neither do we. Their acronym is 3 letters, ours is 4. FINALLY A DIFFERENCE.

There are certain restrictions for withdrawing your Roth IRA funds before retirement, where in Canada we have no such restrictions. You can convert a Roth IRA to a traditional IRA (which is a lot like the 401k) and you can take your TFSA money and use it to fund your RRSP, but that would be silly, because you’d be looking for the tax break.

These plans are more alike than the Sedin twins. FINALLY, A HOCKEY JOKE HERE AT FINANCIAL UPROAR.

Verdict: Roth IRA by a nose.

529 Plan

Keeping up the boring name parade is the 529 plan, America’s version of the registered education savings plan (RESP). Isn’t the IRS allowed to have any fun?

Both plans allow parents to contribute money to fund little Timmy’s education, providing you don’t drop him on his head too many times. The big difference is Canada obviously wants little Timmy to go to school a little more than Obama does (bastard!) because they will give you an extra 20% of your contribution for free, up to a maximum contribution of $2500. So, they’ll top up little Timmy’s RESP by a maximum of $500 per year.

What happens if little Timmy decides college is for chumps, and runs away to join the carnival instead? In Canada, you’d have to pay back any money received from the government (boo!) but the parents get to keep the interest earned (yay!). They can also roll the whole thing into their RRSP, assuming the have the contribution room. Or, you can just give the whole thing to your kid, who’ll have to pay normal tax on the earnings, plus an additional 20% of that tax as a penalty.

(Aside. Want info on RESPs? Go check out MoneySmartsBlog. He’s all over that stuff.)

Meanwhile in the U.S., 529 plans don’t get any extra from the government, they can’t be rolled over into the parent’s 401k and they just generally kind of suck in comparison. They do generally have much higher contribution limits, probably because it’s cheaper to buy Taylor Swift and make her your love slave than go to college. If an American teenager decides against college, parents can transfer the plan to a smarter sibling, or just choose to withdraw it and only face a 10% tax penalty.

Verdict: R! E! S! P!

Now, if you’ll excuse me, there’s a cute bunny in my yard that needs to be chased. Feel free to point out all my errors in the comments.

 

My Canadian is showing again, AND I REFUSE TO COVER IT UP. If you’re an American, this post may not apply to you. I apologize for nothing. Move to Canada. Sure, it’s colder here, but the ladies are hotter and the health care is FREE BABY!

So, let’s assume you were kind of a slacker this year and didn’t bother saving much of anything to use to contribute to your RRSP. You spent the money on strippers and cocaine, and then wasted the rest. Because you’ve heard all about how you should be saving for retirement, you want to contribute, but have the small problem of not having any cash. What’s a poor fella to do? How about an RRSP loan?

RRSP loans are available at your local financial institution at prime +1-2%. (meaning you’d pay 4-5% for one today, depending on your credit worthiness) They can be set up as either a line of credit or a straightforward loan, and I’m sure the bank issuing it will let you take a few years to pay it off if you so choose.

At first glance, they seem like a bad idea. Why not just set aside a few hundred bucks a month to contribute to your RRSP? Better yet, if your employer offers any sort of RRSP match, you should be taking advantage of that right now and than thank them profusely for the free money. And yes, I agree. Ideally you should be contributing every month, or even in one lump sum payment on February 28th because you procrastinated all year. (This may or may not have happened to me)

But what about if you’re just starting on your financial journey?

Let’s assume somebody is in the 40% tax bracket, just for easy figuring. They take out a $5000 RRSP loan at 4%, doing it in February, since they know their income tax refund will be coming back in March. To keep things simple, let’s assume our imaginary person paid exactly enough tax, meaning their entire refund will be because of their RRSP contribution.

If the entire tax refund is put towards the RRSP loan, that means the amount owing is $3000 after just a month. $300 per month takes care of the rest of the loan in 11 months. At a 4% interest rate, a paltry $46 is paid in interest. You paid $46 to access $5000. That is a ridiculously low cost to pay.

There’s a couple caveats. If you don’t use that tax refund to pay down the loan, you obviously shouldn’t bother. And, secondly, if you have to repeat this process every single year, you probably need to work on your savings skills. This strategy is designed for someone just starting out, someone with little debt so they can afford the payments.

Most of the time, someone using this strategy will be getting a larger tax refund than just the one created by contributing to the RRSP. If our imaginary person from above was getting an additional $1000 in a tax refund before contributing to the RRSP, they could pay off that loan in just 7 months, meaning they’d have 5 more months to put that money towards next year’s RRSP contribution.

Naysayers will point out the flaws in recommending someone go into debt. People are morons they’ll argue, why would you recommend they go into debt? Well, I believe that debt used to buy assets is generally good debt, assuming people are smart and pay it off in a reasonable amount of time. Many people abuse debt and it gets them into trouble. There are all sorts of other people who use debt to their advantage. You’d have to be a special kind of moron to borrow to invest in an RRSP if you have credit card debt.

This strategy isn’t for the faint of heart either. By borrowing to contribute, you’re using leverage, which automatically makes any investment more risky. Imagine borrowing $5000 and investing it in the stock market, only to have the market fall 10%. Your $5000 has dropped in value to $4500, and you might not have paid a dime back. If that type of situation makes you all queasy, you probably shouldn’t borrow to invest in general.

And, of course, the higher interest rates get, the less appealing this strategy becomes. If you double the rate, you double the cost of borrowing. (That may have been the most obvious sentence I’ve ever written) At what interest rate does the cost of borrowing become too much?

I actually think borrowing to invest in an RRSP isn’t such a bad idea, providing the borrower pays the damn thing off quickly and doesn’t blow their tax refund on video games and Fanta. Now you can disagree with me in the comments.

 

 

We’re all here for one reason. We’re all working towards financial independence. Well, that, and the pictures of hot chicks every Saturday. Sorry about missing last week, I was busy with family stuff.

Some people though, take financial independence a little too far. I call these guys the early retirement nuts.

There are all sorts of these guys around the personal finance blog-o-net, usually with a certain age in their blog title. Some want to bugger off by 40. Some want to be free by 45. The slackers in the group intend on working until the ripe old age of 50. I think if you intend until working until 55 you’re not invited in the group.

I really feel sorry for these people, with their singular focus on retirement.

Before I crap on their dreams, I fully support their efforts to amass wealth and achieve financial independence. They’re aggressively investing, living frugally and accumulating a significant net worth at an early age. These are good things. These people have their financial houses in order. Everybody should be trying to accumulate wealth. Luckily for those of us who do, most people are pretty bad at it, giving the rest of us ample opportunity to do so.

I definitely agree with the retire early nuts when it comes to accumulating wealth and passive income. What I don’t agree with is the retire early mantra.

First of all, what’s so bad about work? I like my job. I get paid very fairly, considering I sell potato chips for a living. I get paid to move around and to talk to people who are generally quite pleasant. Sure, there are negative aspects to my job, just like any job. The positives outweigh the negatives. When the ratio flips I’ll quit. This is pretty simple stuff.

I ascribe to the Ayn Rand philosophy that work is valuable. I’m exchanging my best attributes to build something of value. It’s not surprising that I lose interest in a job when I no longer get passionate about my role in running the business. I could never be one of those stay at home dads. Remember that, ladies who want to have my babies. Yeah, I’m talking to you, Taylor Swift.

P.S. Call me.

So I think work is valuable. And yet there’s a group of people who want to quit as soon as possible and live on the proceeds of their hard work. There are all sorts of reasons they cite for their early retirement dreams, with the most common being freedom. They want to be free to do some project that may not be the most financially rewarding. Or maybe they want to be free to sit around and mine for treasures up their nose. Whatever floats your boat.

So you’re one of these early retirement guys. You work until, say, 40, and then you quit forever. So you accumulate a net worth of some impressive number- and here’s the kicker- slowly deplete it for the rest of your life. Uh, yay?

Call me greedy (you’re greedy!) but I don’t plan at stopping accumulating money. As I wrote about last week, I view accumulating wealth as a game with many possible successful strategies. Part of that strategy is investing my money, while another part of it is working so I have more money to invest. The circle repeats itself for years, hopefully with the result being that I retire wealthy- at around 60.

If you’re the kind of person who works really hard to get ahead and retire early, you’re probably not the kind of person who should be retiring early. Keep working. Take some of that excess capital and put it to work by starting your own business. That way you can work and have the freedom to do whatever you want.

Whenever I go on vacation, I’m bored by the end of it. I’m actually excited about going back to work. Because of this, I know that having large amounts of free time is something that doesn’t appeal to me. Even when I do actually retire, I hope that managing my investments is close enough to a full time job that it keeps me from going insane.

Anyway, I don’t get the whole retiring early thing. Accumulating wealth I get, setting a deadline to retire I don’t. If any of you retire early guys want to disagree with me, I cede the floor to you.

 

My grandparents own a golf course.

When I was a kid, I thought this was the coolest thing ever. I would spend almost entire summers out there. While there, I’d spend easily 8 hours a day golfing. Being the owners’ grandson meant I could sneak on the course whenever I wanted, getting in a quick 9 holes whenever there was an opening. I also served as a distraction for my Grandpa, he’d take time to stop working to golf with me. Grandma would make me all sorts of good stuff, my favorite being cheeseburgers. Some of my favorite childhood memories are from my time spent on the golf course, including the time I got a hole in one.

My Grandpa is over 80 now. My Grandma hasn’t been involved in the day to day operations of the golf course for more than 10 years. They’re both old and are starting to inevitably slow, both mentally and physically. Both have had heart problems over the past year. Grandpa has realized he can’t work anymore, so he’s started the process of selling the golf course.

As you can imagine, selling a golf course is much more difficult than selling a house. There aren’t many people who have both the means and desire to buy one. There is a mountain of paperwork that is needed for any prospective buyer. Grandpa is a little slow these days, so getting the proper paperwork in order takes a little while. I’m not too involved in the process, but I can imagine it’s beginning to turn into a nightmare.

I know a guy who is turning 72 this year. He is quite wealthy, I’d estimate his net worth to be over $2M. He owns quite a few rental properties, as well as a good chunk of change in the stock market. Since he’s in his 70s, one would think he’s going to start slowing down and selling his rentals soon, putting the proceeds in something safe and boring.

He has no intention of selling a single property anytime soon. In fact, he just bought another one.

This Can’t End Well

My Grandparents and my friend are both going to experience some pain before things get worked out. Both are wealthy enough from other investments to ensure they have enough to live on while they wait for assets to sell. Even though they’re not screwed financially (unlike the Wal-Mart greeter Leonard) they still haven’t put themselves in a good financial spot.

All my Grandparents want is to get rid of the burden of this business. They want the money from the sale to ensure that they’ll have enough to comfortably survive for their last years here, as well as leave an inheritance to their children. I’m not sure if they’d ever admit it (my Grandpa definitely wouldn’t) but the prudent plan would have been to sell it 5 years ago when both were healthy and still active.

My early 70s friend isn’t in that same boat, but he could be soon. Health is a fickle thing, especially as you get older. My Grandpa went from working to in a hospital bed in about a day. I’m sure all of you can tell me similar stories about your relatives. We never know when our health is going to fail on us.

One day, my friend will fall ill. Perhaps he’ll die, hopefully he’ll live. In either situation, he’ll be sitting on all sorts of illiquid assets that someone will have to sell. This is not an ideal situation for someone who already has the stress of being sick on their plate.

Proper Planning Is Key

It isn’t really that hard to avoid being in the shoes of my Grandparents and friend.

Once someone gets to the point of thinking about retirement, then it’s time to move your investments into safe, liquid instruments. Things like government bonds and boring stocks like utilities should be purchased for a portfolio. GICs (or CDs) deserve a place in a portfolio as well. Capital preservation should be key.

Yes, these investments won’t grow much. The whole basket will barely out perform inflation. As you already know though, retirement isn’t the time to take risks with your investments. All it takes is a little planning to avoid being stuck with illiquid assets.

One look around and it’s easy for me to see the results poor planning can have on a family. My family is having to deal with selling an asset that should have been sold years ago. My Grandparents are stressed out about it, which makes their kids stressed out. Their inability to plan properly is affecting everyone around them.

Why This Matters At Any Age

I don’t care if you’re 18 or 80, liquidity matters.

Most financial type people solve this problem with an emergency fund. And even though I somewhat disagree with someone keeping large amounts of cash on hand, I always maintain a balance in my chequing account of $10k. The security of liquidity is important to me.

Alternatively, someone can use a line of credit or credit cards for an emergency fund, PROVIDING they have the cash somewhat easily accessible to pay the loan back without paying much in interest. If you’re the kind of person who feels the need to earn interest all the time, I have no problem keeping your emergency fund cash in good conservative bond funds. This money is accessible enough that you can have it in a few days, giving you plenty of time to pay off a credit card or line of credit with a minimum interest penalty.

Whichever way you choose to treat your emergency fund, just remember the importance of liquidity. Having illiquid assets is fine when you’re young, but please encourage your parents or grandparents to keep them to a minimum.

 

For my birthday two years ago, I was told by my Dad to pick out $50 worth of books on Amazon. Like the kid in the proverbial candy store, I browsed Amazon enthusiastically, deciding on my selections. Since Amazon doesn’t have Playboys, I was forced to buy my next choices, which included a copy of The 4-Hour Workweek, Expanded and Updated: Expanded and Updated, With Over 100 New Pages of Cutting-Edge Content. (That’s an Amazon link. Can you tell?)

I read through it, and was a little disappointed with the content. Tim Ferriss focuses just about entirely on technology, explaining how everything online can be automated, meaning very little time needs to be spent on actual work. Ferris made it sound like financial independence was as easy as finding a decent product, putting in a couple weeks’ worth of work, and then reaping the rewards forever. Like a lot of financial “get rich” books, I didn’t care for it because the way to accomplish success was portrayed as just too easy.

This blog post isn’t to bash The Four Hour Workweek, or Tim Ferriss. I’ll leave that up to this guy. For all that’s bad about the book, there is some good stuff. I think everyone should strive for passive income. Focusing most of your efforts on things that make you the most money is good too. What has me particularly intrigued about the book lately is the concept of mini retirements.

What Is A Mini Retirement?

In the book, Ferriss brags a lot about the free time he has because of his insanely profitable internet businesses. With all his free time, he does and learns about all sorts of things. The big benefit of the Four Hour Workweek, according to Ferriss, is someone will finally have the free time that they can finally do the things they’ve dreamed of.

For me, this is not ideal.

When I think of mini retirements, I think about what Fabulously Broke is doing. For those of you too lazy to click the link, (damn, that’s lazy. I like it) she has decided to take the rest of 2011 off to spend time travelling to Asia, NYC and California, as well as spending time with her family. Because she’s been so good with her money, she has the freedom to do this. When her travel year is over, she’ll find another consulting gig and life will go on.

Maybe I’ve hit some sort of quarter (plus a bit) life crisis, but this idea sounds really cool.

My Mini Retirement Plan

I am a huge baseball fan. If my baseball love was a Star Wars villain, it would be Jabba The Hut. Get it? Because he’s so huge?

Yep, Star Wars jokes. You get what you pay for people.

My dream trip has always been to take a summer and travel around and watch a baseball game at all 30 MLB stadiums. When I was 19, I almost convinced a buddy to go with me, but he clearly couldn’t afford it. Since then, it’s always been something I’d like to do, but was relegated to a retirement activity.

My fellow chip jockey and I were talking after work the other day, over beers at my place, and the conversation turned to his upcoming retirement, like it has so many times in the past few months. I asked him about all the fun trips he was going to take once he was out of the rat race. After all, he is only 60. He works a fairly physical job, and isn’t all tuckered out at the end of the day. He has a fairly active lifestyle. I expected him to tell me about all sorts of adventures he had planned.

Instead, his answer was almost shocking. All he was looking forward to was taking it easy. He explained that once you get to be his age, all you want to do is take it easy around the house and hang out with your grandkids- sometimes. You don’t have the ambition or energy to embark on anything more than a weekend trip. He figures he’ll find some sort of part time job, and the closest thing he’ll take to a vacation is helping take care of the grandkids while his daughter and son-in-law take their holidays.

His answers made me reconsider my decision to push my baseball trip to retirement.

Priorities

I’ve spent many hours over the years crunching out the numbers for my baseball trip. I’ve always figured I could do it for $15k, ($100 per day for 150 days) but I’d budget $20k just to be safe. To be able to spend months away from home for such a small amount, I’d have to make sacrifices while travelling. I would have to stay at hostels. I would be taking the bus from point a to point b. Expensive entertainment would be out. I wouldn’t be able to drink, which would be the easiest sacrifice, considering I don’t drink anymore.

If I wanted to, I could come up with $20k tomorrow. I’ve got cash in the bank, along with cash put aside for a new car. I’ve got cash sitting in a brokerage account. I’ve got profitable (and not so profitable) investments I could sell. Coming up with the money wouldn’t be a problem.

I have a mortgage that I pay down fairly aggressively. If I change my mortgage for the few months I’m gone, my payments can get down so it only costs me a couple hundred bucks a month once I factor in basement rent. My passive income can easily manage that. If I really wanted to, I could find someone to live in my house for the few months, giving them a smokin deal on the rent in exchange for taking care of the place.

The point of all this? If I really wanted this trip to happen, I could make it work.

Seize The Day

I’m 27 years old. If I don’t do this trip soon, I’ll end up with a gf/wife and 2.2 kids. While I want these things, there are things I want to do before settling down.

The big thing I’m struggling with is the opportunity I could miss. Let me explain further.

When my co-worker retires, his job opens up. Part of the reason I was hired was to train for this possibility. If no one with more experience than me wants his job, I get it. Since I live in a small town, the chances of someone moving here to take the job aren’t really that high.

This is a surprisingly lucrative job. It starts at just a little under $100k per year. Even though the boss can be annoying, for the most part we get left alone. The company has a decent pension plan. They give 3 weeks vacation every year (except to newbies like me, grr). It’s a decent job, and I think I’d be happy doing it.

The time of reckoning will come sometime this summer. Part of me almost hopes I don’t even get offered the job. It’ll make this trip decision a whole lot easier.

What Should I Do?

Running a chip route is a decent opportunity. It’s a good job without much stress.

On the other hand, I can always find a job. If I make $40k a year, I’m happy. I live cheaply and have lots of passive income. I can save money if I make $40k a year.

Is a once in a lifetime trip reason enough to throw away a good job opportunity? That’s the question I struggle with.

 

© 2012 Financial Uproar Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Switch to our mobile site